Calculating Heat Capacity, deltaU and deltaH of Cu Metal

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the heat capacity, deltaU, and deltaH for 100 grams of copper (Cu) heated from 0°C to 100°C at constant pressure. The molar heat capacity of Cu is given as 24.4 J/molK, and the density values at different temperatures are provided. The calculated values show that Q and deltaH are approximately equal to deltaU, both around 3840 J, while the work done (W) is about -0.0057 J. There is a correction noted regarding the number of moles used in the heat calculation, emphasizing the importance of accurate conversions in thermodynamic calculations. The discussion highlights the relationship between deltaH and deltaU for solids and liquids under constant pressure conditions.
petewil2009
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


At 25C Cu metal (at. wt. 63.54 g/mol) has a molar heat capacity of 24.4 J/molK. The density of Cu is 8.949g/cm^3 at 0C and 8.904 g/cm^3 at 100C. Assuming that Cp is temperature independent, calculate Q, W, deltaU and deltaH when 100grams of Cu metal are heated from 0C to 100C under constant pressure 1atm.

Ans. Q=deltaH is about equal to deltaU = 3840J, W=-.0057J

Note: deltaH is about equal to deltaU for heating of solids and liquids at constant pressure because these materials exhibit very low volume changes on heating.

The Attempt at a Solution



density = m/v so v=m/density so
V1=100g/8.949g/cm^3 = 11.17cm^3 and V2 = 100g/8.904 g/cm^3 = 11.23cm^3
W=-P(V2-V1) = -1atm((11.23X10^-2(m^3))-(11.17X10^-2(m^3)))=-.0006J about correct?

Q=nCn(Tf-Ti)
n=((63.54g/mol)/(100g))=.6354mol
Q = (.6354mol)(24.4J/molK)(373K) = 5782.9J not so correct?...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have 100g and molar mass is 63.5g, having 0.63 moles is off. It is just like stating "I have $100, this book is $50, so I can buy only a half"...
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top