Calculating Heat of Combustion for C2H6: Homework Statement Help

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the heat of combustion for ethane (C2H6) using given reaction enthalpies. The user attempts to derive the heat of combustion by manipulating the provided equations and applying heats of formation. Initial calculations suggest a final answer of 1558.3 kJ, but the user questions its accuracy. Another calculation using heats of formation yields a different result of 1429 kJ/mol. The conversation emphasizes the importance of verifying calculations and the reliability of online tools for thermodynamic data.
chemzz
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate the heat of combustion for C2H6 from the following information:
C2H4+ 3O2----> 2 CO2 + 2 H2O (-1409.5kJ)
C2H4 + H2 ----> C2H2 (-136.7 KJ)
H2 + 1/2 O2 -----> H2O ( -285.5 kJ)





The Attempt at a Solution



C2H6 --> C2H4 + H2 +136.7kJ
C2H4 + 302 --> 2CO2 + 2H20 -1409.5kJ
C2H6 + 3O2 --> 2CO2 + 2H2O + H2 -1272.8kJ
H2 + 1/2 O2 --> H2O -285.5Kj
C2H6 + 3.5O2 --> 2CO2 + 3H2O - 1558.3kJ


is my final answer 1558.3 correct?:confused: can someone check this for me pleasez
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is close.
I have the following:
C2H6 + 2.5O2 --> 2CO2 + 3H2O + DH
Applying heats of formations for each compound:
-85 + 2.5*0 = 2*(-394) + 3*(-242) + DH
DH = 1429 kJ/mol

You may use the following calculator http://home.fuse.net/clymer/rq/ but I found it not being very accurate.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top