Calculating Heat Transfer in Melting Ice: A Thermochemistry Problem

AI Thread Summary
To determine how much ice melts when 13.4 kJ of heat is added to 1 kg of ice at 0ºC, it is essential to understand that 333 kJ is required to melt the entire 1 kg of ice. Since 1 g of ice requires 333 J to melt, 13.4 kJ can melt approximately 40 g of ice. The discussion emphasizes the distinction between latent heat and temperature change, noting that melting ice involves latent heat where temperature remains constant. The correct approach involves using the latent heat equation rather than the temperature change equation. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving thermochemistry problems related to phase changes.
ThePageHendrix
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If 13.4 kJ of heat is added 1.00 kg of ice at 0ºC, how much ice will be melted

Homework Equations



Change of Heat = mass*change of temperature*constant

change of heat fusion (water) = 333 J/g

change of heat water vapor = 2260 J/g

change of heat total = change of heat (state) + change of heat (temp change)

constant of water = 4.184 J/gºC

constant of ice = 2.1 J/gºC

The Attempt at a Solution



(1000g)(2.1J/gºC)(?-0) + (13400g*333J/gºC)

Answer = 40g
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi ThePageHendrix. Welcome to Physics Forums!

If it takes 333 kj to melt the entire 1 kg of ice, how much ice will only 13.4 kj melt?

Chet
 
Thanks for answering!

Sorry, but it takes 333 joules, not kj, to melt the ice. I'm sorry, but I am just really lost on how to approach this problem.

Any more help is appreciated, thanks!
 
ThePageHendrix said:
Thanks for answering!

Sorry, but it takes 333 joules, not kj, to melt the ice. I'm sorry, but I am just really lost on how to approach this problem.

Any more help is appreciated, thanks!
It takes 333J to melt 1 gm; it takes 333kJ to melt 1 kg.
 
ThePageHendrix said:
Change of Heat = mass*change of temperature*constant

This equation describes amount of heat when dealing with the temperature change. When the ice melts, temperature doesn't change (in such cases we say it is a "latent heat"). Latent heat requires different equation. Chet already pointed you at the intuition behind the other equation you need.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top