Calculating Height After Bump: A Physics Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter physx_matter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Height Physics
AI Thread Summary
To determine the height reached by a bicycle after losing contact with a speed bump, the bicycle's speed, mass, and the bump's radius are critical factors. The bicycle will lose contact when the normal force is zero, which can be analyzed using centripetal acceleration and energy conservation principles. The angle of contact loss can be calculated using the formula for centripetal acceleration, a = v²/r. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding these physics concepts, particularly for someone returning to the subject after a break. Engaging with these principles can enhance problem-solving skills in physics.
physx_matter
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello fellow physicists, I am seeking help on the following problem:

A bicycle is moving over a speed bump at 6.9m/s. Calculate the height reached by the bicycle once it looses contact with the speed bump. Radius of the speed bump is 1.7m and mass of the bicycle is 83 kg. For this problem consider the bicycle as a point mass. Height of the speed bump is 10.2 cm.

You can consider that the bicycle is moving as a projectile once it has lost contact with the speed bump.


Any help much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just a note: I have not done physics for around two years now and saw this question and found it interesting. I have tried to use the v=u+at and other equations and simply cannot find how to go about this. I studied physics at A-level but did am doing Pharmacy at university. It's not for homework or anything just something I was curious about! Thanks.
 
Welcome to PF!

Hello physx_matter! Welcome to PF! :wink:

The bicycle will lose contact when the normal force is zero.

So use F = ma in the normal direction, and the centripetal acceleration formula, a = v2/r, to find the angle at which is loses contact. After that, use conservation of energy. :smile:
 
Thanks for the welcome Tiny tim and also great advice! I need to brush up my physics as I enjoyed it quite alot. Might bring out my old A-level textbook once uni exams are done. I'm off to hit the notepad.

:) Thanks again.
 
Hello again Tiny Tim, I am still stuck on this question. If the normal forceis 0 the a=0 aso does it not? Also to find the angle it leaves the bump I would need a formula that has theta in it as far as I can remember. WIll I not need to use the angular velocity equation? This has me in loops now :(.
 
No, a = v2/r, where r is the radius of curvature.

Yes, you need to find θ, but you don't need the angular velocity.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top