Calculating Height of Rolling Marble

AI Thread Summary
A marble rolls down a frictional track from height h1 and ascends a frictionless track to height h2, where h2 is less than h1. The moment of inertia for the marble is calculated as I = (7/5)mR^2. The gravitational potential energy at height h1 converts into both translational and rotational kinetic energy as the marble descends. The energy conservation principle leads to the conclusion that h2 can be expressed as h2 = (25/35)h1, confirming that the marble cannot rise higher than its starting height. This analysis illustrates the relationship between potential and kinetic energy in rolling motion.
cristina
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
A marble of mass M and radius R rolls without slipping down the track on the left from a height h1. The marble then goes up the frictionless track on the right to a height h2 where h2<h1 . Find h2.
I don't know how to think of this one, any hints please?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If there was friction on h1 and no friction on h2, there is no way h2 is higher than h1.

On h1, the friction makes it roll. So you need to know the moment of inertia.

I = \frac{2}{5}mR^2 + mR^2

I = \frac{7}{5}mR^2


At the bottom of the first track, the rotational energy will equal the initial gravitational energy

\frac{1}{2}I \omega ^2 = mgh

\frac{7}{10}mR^2 \omega ^2 = mgh_1

\omega ^2 = \frac{10gh_1}{7R^2}


Now write the energy from rolling down h1 a different way, this time rotating around the centre with the centre of rotation moving down the slope

\frac{1}{2}I \omega ^2 + \frac{1}{2}mv^2 = mgh_1

\frac{1}{2}mv^2 = mgh_1 - \frac{1}{2}I \omega ^2

\frac{1}{2}mv^2 = mgh_1 - \frac{1}{5}mR^2 (\frac{10gh_1}{7R^2})

\frac{1}{2}mv^2 = mgh_1 - \frac{10}{35}mgh_1

Now that kinetic energy (the left side of that equation) is the one that makes the marble go up to h2, so make an equation for that.

mgh_2 = mgh_1 - \frac{10}{35}mgh_1

mgh_2 = \frac{25}{35}mgh_1

cancel the m and the g

h_2 = \frac{25}{35}h_1



Can somebody confirm this answer?
 
Last edited:
May you please give some explanation before confirming the answer?
Thank you.
 
cristina said:
May you please give some explanation before confirming the answer?
ShawnD's analysis is correct, but can be simplified. Here's how to understand what's going on:

When the ball rolls down the track there is friction causing it to roll without slipping. Remember that the condition for rolling without slipping is V = ωR.

The ball starts with an initial gravitational PE = mgh1. As the ball rolls down, that PE is converted to translational KE (1/2mV2) and rotational KE about the center of mass (1/2Iω2). Remember that the two KEs are tied by V = ωR.

When the ball rolls up the track, there is no friction so the rotational KE remains fixed. Only the translational KE is converted to gravitational PE = mgh2. So, solve for the translational KE at the bottom of track using:
mgh1 = 1/2mV2 + 1/2Iω2, along with: V = ωR.
Remember you are solving for 1/2mV2, so don't do any unnecessary work. Your answer will be some multiple of mgh1. Now set that equal to mgh2, and solve for h2.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top