Calculating Horizontal Velocity of Rock Kicked Off Bridge in Arkansas

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the horizontal velocity of a rock kicked off a 321m high bridge into the Arkansas River. The rock is kicked horizontally, resulting in an initial vertical velocity of zero, as it begins to fall only under the influence of gravity. The horizontal displacement is 45m, and while the rock travels 321m vertically, it does so in free fall, accelerating downward. The trajectory of the rock is parabolic, but the vertical distance is measured as a straight line. Understanding these principles clarifies the calculations involved in determining the rock's speed.
MIA6
Messages
231
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A bridge rises 321m above the Arkansas river. Suppose you kick a rock horizontally off the bridge. The magnitude of the rock's horizontal displacement is 45.0 m. Fine the speed at which the rock was kicked.


Homework Equations


Vi=Vx. Dx=45m. Dy=-321m


The Attempt at a Solution


I know how to find the speed, but my question is on my book, it says that there is no initial vertical velocity. WHy? i think when you kick a rock off the bridge, there is a initial vertical velocity?! so why the vertical initial velocity is 0? hope you can explain it to me.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MIA6 said:

The Attempt at a Solution


I know how to find the speed, but my question is on my book, it says that there is no initial vertical velocity. WHy? i think when you kick a rock off the bridge, there is a initial vertical velocity?! so why the vertical initial velocity is 0? hope you can explain it to me.
The rock is kicked horizontally (impulsively) off the bridge so that it has a constant horizontal velocity only as it leaves the bridge. It then starts falling vertically with zero initial velocity, as though it was simply released from rest. It then obviously starts accelerating with gravity.

In the time that it take to fall from the point of release to the ground, it also travels 45 m horizontally.
 
ok, i get it. so the ball travels 321m vertically in free fall?
 
MIA6 said:
ok, i get it. so the ball travels 321m vertically in free fall?
Yes. Constant acceleration, g, with no initial velocity (and perhaps ignoring wind resistance).
 
but i have a question, because i know that 321m is a path that vertical straight down, but the path that the ball travels is half of the parabola, so if we meansure the curve and the straight line, they won't be the same.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top