Calculating Hydraulic Pressure in a Neutron Star

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating hydraulic pressure within a neutron star, assuming it is made from incompressible material. The original poster presents a scenario involving gravitational acceleration and pressure calculations at a specific depth below the surface.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate pressure using gravitational acceleration and density, but questions arise regarding the assumptions made about the material properties and the gravitational field's constancy. Subsequent posts introduce the concept of hydrostatic equilibrium and the need to consider the gravitational field's variation with depth.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, providing feedback on the original poster's calculations and suggesting corrections. There is an ongoing exploration of the gravitational effects within the neutron star, with some participants indicating that the original approach may not fully account for the complexities of the gravitational field.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the gravitational field inside the star is not constant and that the contributions of mass outside a given radius do not affect the gravitational field at that radius. This highlights the need for careful consideration of the assumptions regarding the star's structure and material properties.

j-e_c
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Assuming a neutron star is made from an incompressible material, what is the hydraulic pressure 50m below the surface?

Mass = 1.98x10^30kg
Radius = 10km

2. The attempt at a solution

g=GM/r^2 = (6.67x10^-11 x 1.98x10^30)/ 10000^2 = 1.32x10^12 m/s^2

P=P_{0} + \rhogh Pa

\rho = m/v = 1.98x10^30 / (4/3 x pi x 10000^3) = 4.73x10^17 kg/m^3

If pressure in space is 0 Pa, then P = 0 + 4.73x10^17 x 1.32x10^12 x 50

= 3.12x10^31 Pa

Is this correct? Thank for your time!

Edit: I think it might be wrong because my equation assumes that space (as a vacuum) and the star are one material (?) :s.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the differential equation of hydrostatic equilibrium:

\frac{dP}{dh} = -\rho g

Remember that the gravitational acceleration g changes with h
In your calculation, you assumed that it was constant and equal to the surface gravitation. That is incorrect.
\rho, on the other hand, is constant as the star is incompressible.
 
Thanks, for your reply. Here is my second attempt:

dP = - \rhogdh

\frac{dP}{dh} = -\rhog

\int\frac{dP}{dh}dh = \int-\rhogdh

P = -\rhoGM\int\frac{1}{r^{2}}dh between 10000 and 9950

P = -\rhoGM [\frac{1}{r}] 10000...9950

= -\rhoGM [\frac{1}{10000}-\frac{1}{9950}]

=3.14x10^{31} Pa

I apologize for integrating r with respect to h, if that was confusing.
 
Last edited:
That too is incorrect. ;) Though you're on the right track!

Remember that a spherical shell contributes no \frac{1}{r^2} field inwards. That is to say, when calculating the gravitational field inside the star at a radius r_0<R, you must only regard the contribution of the mass inside, at radii 0<r<r_0, as all the mass on the outside contributes nothing to the gravitational field!
 
OK, I've got it, thanks RoyalCat!
 
j-e_c said:
OK, I've got it, thanks RoyalCat!

You're welcome!

As a hint, the gravitational field rises linearly with the radius inside the star, in case you happen to get anything different.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
20K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
11K