Calculating Hydraulic Pressure in a Neutron Star

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the hydraulic pressure 50 meters below the surface of a neutron star, assuming it is incompressible. Initial calculations incorrectly assumed constant gravitational acceleration, leading to an erroneous pressure value of 3.12x10^31 Pa. Participants highlighted the need to use hydrostatic equilibrium and consider the gravitational field's variation with depth. The correct approach involves integrating the gravitational field, which increases linearly within the star, and only accounting for the mass inside the radius of interest. Ultimately, the pressure calculation requires careful consideration of these factors for accuracy.
j-e_c
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Assuming a neutron star is made from an incompressible material, what is the hydraulic pressure 50m below the surface?

Mass = 1.98x10^30kg
Radius = 10km

2. The attempt at a solution

g=GM/r^2 = (6.67x10^-11 x 1.98x10^30)/ 10000^2 = 1.32x10^12 m/s^2

P=P_{0} + \rhogh Pa

\rho = m/v = 1.98x10^30 / (4/3 x pi x 10000^3) = 4.73x10^17 kg/m^3

If pressure in space is 0 Pa, then P = 0 + 4.73x10^17 x 1.32x10^12 x 50

= 3.12x10^31 Pa

Is this correct? Thank for your time!

Edit: I think it might be wrong because my equation assumes that space (as a vacuum) and the star are one material (?) :s.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the differential equation of hydrostatic equilibrium:

\frac{dP}{dh} = -\rho g

Remember that the gravitational acceleration g changes with h
In your calculation, you assumed that it was constant and equal to the surface gravitation. That is incorrect.
\rho, on the other hand, is constant as the star is incompressible.
 
Thanks, for your reply. Here is my second attempt:

dP = - \rhogdh

\frac{dP}{dh} = -\rhog

\int\frac{dP}{dh}dh = \int-\rhogdh

P = -\rhoGM\int\frac{1}{r^{2}}dh between 10000 and 9950

P = -\rhoGM [\frac{1}{r}] 10000...9950

= -\rhoGM [\frac{1}{10000}-\frac{1}{9950}]

=3.14x10^{31} Pa

I apologize for integrating r with respect to h, if that was confusing.
 
Last edited:
That too is incorrect. ;) Though you're on the right track!

Remember that a spherical shell contributes no \frac{1}{r^2} field inwards. That is to say, when calculating the gravitational field inside the star at a radius r_0<R, you must only regard the contribution of the mass inside, at radii 0<r<r_0, as all the mass on the outside contributes nothing to the gravitational field!
 
OK, I've got it, thanks RoyalCat!
 
j-e_c said:
OK, I've got it, thanks RoyalCat!

You're welcome!

As a hint, the gravitational field rises linearly with the radius inside the star, in case you happen to get anything different.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top