Calculating Ice Cube Landing Points Using Galilean Relativity

AI Thread Summary
Two trains, A and B, are moving at constant speeds of 5 m/s and 2 m/s, respectively, while an observer at the station watches a passenger in train A drop an ice cube from a height of 1.40 m. The ice cube will have no horizontal velocity relative to passenger A, making its landing point straightforward to calculate from that perspective. To determine the landing point for passenger B and the ground observer, the time it takes for the ice cube to fall must first be calculated using the height and gravitational acceleration. After finding the time, Galilean transformations can be applied to find the horizontal displacement for both observers. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding these transformations for future applications, such as Lorentz transformations.
busted
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
2 trains are traveling at constant speeds on 2 parralel straight line. The first A is traveling at 5m/s the second B is traveling at 2 m/s. An observer at the station observes both trains. At a given instant of time, a passenger in A, a passenger in B and the observer at the sation are all aligned along a line normal to the motion of the trains. At that point, a passenger in A drops an ice cube from his drink which he is holding at a height of 1.40m. Using Galilean relativity where will the ice cube land as far as each observer is concerned?

I worked out for A to be x' + u't' = 0 as u' = 0 as there is no horizontal velocity of ice cube relative to A.

Im not sure of the formula to work out B and for ground observer can someone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
any ideas would be useful, I am not sure whether I am expected to work out the time of how long it will take for the ice cube to land using the distance 1.4 m and gravity?
 
Yes, they expect you to work out the time using gravity and the initial height of the cube, then use Galilean coordinate transformations on this (you could also work out the problems with the cube having an initial velocity equal to the relative velocities, but it sounds like they want you to explicity start with a Galilean transformation, so that you get a feel for how to use Lorentz transformations later on).
 
Last edited:
any ideas anyone?
 
is my method for the asnwer for observer A correct??
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top