Calculating Initial Acceleration for a Steel Object on a Rail | 21 N Tension

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the initial acceleration of a 0.89 kg steel object on a rail pulled by a 21 N tension cord at a 45-degree angle, the net forces in both x and y directions must be analyzed. The x-direction equation incorporates the tension's cosine component and kinetic friction, while the y-direction equation balances forces to find the normal force. It's crucial to confirm that static friction is overcome before proceeding with calculations. The discussion highlights the importance of using significant figures in measurements and clarifies the distinction between rolling friction and rolling resistance. Understanding these concepts is essential for accurately determining the object's acceleration.
rysezhae
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I need to find the initial acceleration of a steel object that weighs .89 kg, that is pulled along a steel a rail by a cord. The cord is at an 45 degree angle and has a tension of 21 N. The friction coefficents(spelled right?) of steel on steel are: .8 for static friction, .6 for kinetic friction and .002 for for rolling friction.

Homework Equations


F=ma
Fp=21 N


The Attempt at a Solution


What i did was separate the net forces into the x direction and the y direction. In the x direction i got Fpcos(theta)-Fk=max (x = x direction). I then solved for ax giving me (Fpcos(theta)-Fk)/m.
Since Fk =ukFn (kinetic friction coefficent * normal force), i substituted that in for Fk in ax. In the y direction i got, Fpsin(theta)+Fn-Fe=0. I solved for Fn then substituted that back in for Fn in the ax equation getting: (Fpcos(theta)-uk(Fe-Fpsin(theta)))/m. No sig figs required, since the problem doesn't say anything about it
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##\cos(45^\circ)=\sin(45^\circ)=1/\sqrt{2}##

I'd have wanted to see you check that static friction is overcome first.

You require sig figs whenever you have measurements in your calculations - or do you think the values given are infinitely accurate?

Did you have a question?
 
rysezhae said:
.002 for rolling friction.
What's rolling here? If the object can roll then you might need to worry about moment of inertia. (I dislike the term 'rolling friction'. Sometimes people confuse it with static friction. It is often not a form of friction, but rather of imperfect elasticity. 'Rolling resistance' is better.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top