Calculating Kinetic Energy of Electron & Neutrino in Beta Decay of Caesium

  • Thread starter Thread starter Minus1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Neutrino
Minus1
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
One of the unstable isotopes of caesium undergoes beta decay, as a result of which it turns into an isotope of Barium, with the simultaneous emission of an electron and a neutrino. The Caesium isotope is 1.18 Mev/c^2 more massive than the Barium isotope.



Assuming that the initial and final isotopes are produced at rest , how much kinetic energy is carried of by the electron and neutrino? Explain why this must be equal to
T+cp
where T is the kinetic energy of the electron and p is the magnitude of its momentum

Use the result to determine the value of T


I have No idea at all what to do so any help at all would be greatly appreciated

(rest mass of electron=0.511Mev/c^2 and neutrino assume massless)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know the expression for the total energy of a relativistic particle? (You should)

Add up the energies of the barium atom, the electron, and the neutrino. The sum should be equal to the energy of the cesium atom. You will also need to apply conservation of momentum.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top