Calculating Kinetic & Potential Energy of Rama's Impact

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the energy of Rama before it impacts Earth, both kinetic energy (KE) and potential energy (PE) must be considered. The relevant equations include KE = 1/2 mv^2 and the gravitational potential energy equation. As Rama descends, its potential energy decreases while its kinetic energy increases, maintaining a constant total energy. To find the final kinetic energy upon impact, one must account for the change in potential energy during the descent. The final equation can be expressed as Efinal = Ekinetic + change in Epotential, ensuring the correct signs for energy changes are applied.
Mecia22
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


-- This is out of Rendezvous With Rama by Arthur C. Clarke
You know it is 907184 kg and is going 50,000 m/s
So how much energy does it have right before it hits the earth?

Homework Equations



Do I use Fg= Gm1m2/r^2 ?
Ek=1/2mv^2?
I have ΔE=1/2mv^2 written down as an equation to use as well.

The Attempt at a Solution


I think I'm supposed to calculate the potential energy at 2 different spots and find the ΔE, but I'm not sure.

E=Gm1m2/r+1/2mv^2 would that work?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


At any particular point it has both KE and PE. As it descends, PE decreases and KE increases by the same amount. At the point you describe the KE is given by Ek=1/2mv^2, but to know what the energy will be when it strikes Earth you also need to know how much PE it will lose in the remaining descent. So you need the altitude at the point where the speed is known.
 


haruspex said:
At any particular point it has both KE and PE. As it descends, PE decreases and KE increases by the same amount. At the point you describe the KE is given by Ek=1/2mv^2, but to know what the energy will be when it strikes Earth you also need to know how much PE it will lose in the remaining descent. So you need the altitude at the point where the speed is known.


Okay, so then the equation would be E=EK+EP?
 


Depends what you mean by EP there. Write the equation in terms of four entities: Eki = KE at known initial point, Epi = PE at known initial point, Ekf = KE on collision, Epf = PE on collision.
 


Yikes... you're confusing me.
I guess what I'm asking is what steps would I do to get to my final equation?Would it be Efinal=Ekinetic+change of Epotential ?
 
Last edited:


Mecia22 said:
Yikes... you're confusing me.
I guess what I'm asking is what steps would I do to get to my final equation?


Would it be Efinal=Ekinetic+change of Epotential ?

Yes, provided (i) Efinal means the KE on impact, and (ii) you get the sign right on the change in potential.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top