Calculating Magnetic Flux Density for an Electron Orbiting Near Earth's Surface

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the magnetic flux density of Earth for an electron orbiting near its surface, equating magnetic force with centripetal force to derive the magnetic field strength as 8.9e-12 Tesla. Participants express confusion about the neglect of gravitational force and its potential impact on the electron's rotation direction and magnetic force. It is suggested that the gravitational force is negligible in this context. The user attempts to calculate the electron's velocity using the magnetic field strength but arrives at an implausibly high value of 2.37e13, indicating a possible error in their calculations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate mathematical application in physics problems.
Ben King
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I've been given a question to find the magnetic flux density of the Earth if an electron is orbiting near to the surface. The answer to the question makes the magnetic force equal to the centripetal force and solves for B from there.

However, I am confused to why the gravitational force has no effect and won't the direction of rotation of the electrons have an effect on the direction of the magnetic force and hence the magnitude of the centripetal force? Thanks

The answer given was 8.9e-12 Tesla
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to the PF.

(In the future, please use the Template that you are provided when starting a new schoolwork thread -- it helps to organize your post).

I'd start by comparing the Lorentz force to the gravitational force on the electron. Maybe the gravitational force is negligible...? Can you show us the calculations?
 
Thanks for the reply. Your suggestion about the gravitational force being negligible is true I think, so that answered that question. However I altered the equation to find velocity of the electron if the magnetic field strength was the same as the surface magnetic field strength of the Earth and got an answer that was way too large, I'll show the equation below. Is there an error in my maths?
##v=(Bqr/2m) \pm 0.5*\sqrt{(Bqr/m)^2+(4Gm/r)} ##
from ##v^2-(Gm/r)-(Bqr/m)v=0##
I googled the mean value for magnetic field strength on the Earth's surface and found it to be ~##45e-6## Tesla, but when I used that number in the formula I got an answer of ##v=2.37e13##, which is obviously not correct. Thanks again
 
IMG_20180523_223407.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20180523_223407.jpg
    IMG_20180523_223407.jpg
    29.8 KB · Views: 420
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top