Calculating Material Thickness: 5k Ohms CSA 10mm x 20mm

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the thickness of a conductive sheet with a cross-sectional area (CSA) of 10mm x 20mm and a resistivity of 10^3 ohm·m for a target resistance of 5k ohms, the formula Ro = RA/l is applied. The area must first be converted to square meters, resulting in 200 mm² or 0.0002 m². Correct calculations yield a thickness of 1 mm when using the formula correctly with the appropriate units. Discussions highlight the importance of unit conversion and maintaining consistency in calculations. The final consensus is that the thickness required is indeed 1 mm.
Kev1n
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
1. A conductive sheet of material has a CSA of 10mm x 20mm. Reisistivity of 103 (10 to the 3, 10,000) ohms M. Calculate thickness of the material required to give resistance of 5k ohms



2. Ro = RA/l , where l would be thickness, l = RA/Ro



3. Thickness = 5,000 x 0.2 / 10,000 = o.1m therefore 100m

Comments appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are some problems with your calculation:
103 is not 10,000.

The area is not 0.2 (is that supposed to be in m2?). Try converting the mm values to meters first. Remember, 1 mm is 10-3 m.​
 
Redbelly98 said:
There are some problems with your calculation:
103 is not 10,000.

The area is not 0.2 (is that supposed to be in m2?). Try converting the mm values to meters first. Remember, 1 mm is 10-3 m.​

Thanks:

Thickness = 5,000 x 0.0002/ 1,000 = 1 x 10-3m therefore 1mm

or do I have to sq the .ooo2 giving:

=5,000 x 4x10-8 / 1,000 = 2 x 10-7
 
One of those is correct! :smile: Here are 2 questions to help you decide which:

1. How did you get the 0.0002 value for the area, and therefore what are the units associated with this value?

2. Are these units (from my previous question) correct units for an area, or would you need to square the units to to get an area?

Note: correct units for area can be expressed as m2, m·m, mm2, or mm·mm.
 
Redbelly98 said:
One of those is correct! :smile: Here are 2 questions to help you decide which:

1. How did you get the 0.0002 value for the area, and therefore what are the units associated with this value?

2. Are these units (from my previous question) correct units for an area, or would you need to square the units to to get an area?

Note: correct units for area can be expressed as m2, m·m, mm2, or mm·mm.

Hi, thanks for the reply, think I am having a christmas moment.
The area should be 10mm x 20mm = 200mm in m 200 x 10-3 therefore 0.2m
Thickness = 5,000 x 0.2/ 1,000 = 1mm

How does this seem
 
Kev1n said:
Hi, thanks for the reply, think I am having a christmas moment.
The area should be 10mm x 20mm = 200mm ...
I'll stop your post here and make a comment about units.

Just as you multiplied 10 x 20 to get 200, we also need to multiply mm x mm, (since mm appears twice in the values being multiplied) and that gives us mm2. So the units will be mm2, not simply mm as you wrote.

Since mm2 is a unit of area, we have A=200 mm2 for the area. Do not square this value to do the calculation; that would result in units of mm4 which is not a unit of area.

Of course, if you seem to be working in MKS units, we do need to convert from mm2 to m2
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top