Calculating Maximum Deceleration of Re-entry Capsule

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum deceleration of a re-entry capsule returning to Earth, given a re-entry velocity of 7.4 km/s and a flight-path angle of 10 degrees. Participants are attempting to use the formula a max = V^2 re-entry b sin y/ 2e, but are encountering discrepancies in their calculations. One user consistently arrives at an incorrect high value of 9.298x10^10, while another suggests that the atmospheric scale height and the base of the natural logarithm are being misapplied. Clarifications indicate that the BC number pertains to a subsequent part of the problem and that proper division and multiplication by e are crucial for accurate results. The conversation highlights the importance of careful calculation and understanding of the formula components.
spacemike1
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




Contact lenses being manufactured in space are returned in a re-entry capsule to Earth for distribution and sale. If the re-entry velocity is 7.4km/s and the re-entry flight-path angle is 10 degrees, determine the maximum deceleration it will experience and at what altitude? The capsule’s BC is 1000 kg/m^2

Homework Equations



a max = V^2 re-entry b sin y/ 2e


The Attempt at a Solution



a max = 7400m/s^2 (0.000139m^-1 sin(10)) / 2(2.7182)

the answer should be 24.813 , I keep getting a very high number of 9.298x10^10 ... why am I so off?

where .000139m^-1 is the atmospheric scale height and 2.7182 is the base of the natural logarithm.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When I run the same numbers I get 243.122 m/s^2

Where does the BC number figure into the problem?
 
the BC number is actually for the second part of the question. You got closer to me. I tried my calcs again and still getting the same off-base number. I've plugged it into the calculator just like this.

7400^2 (0.000139m^-1 sin(10)) / 2(2.7182) and get 9.298x10^10
 
You apparently are dividing by 0.000139m^-1.
 
D H said:
You apparently are dividing by 0.000139m^-1.

...and multiplying by e.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top