Calculating Maximum Height of an Arrow with Loss of Mechanical Energy

AI Thread Summary
A 125-gram arrow is shot vertically with an initial velocity of 28 m/s, and the problem involves calculating the maximum height reached considering a 20% loss in mechanical energy. The kinetic energy (Ek) was calculated as 98 J, and the gravitational energy (Eg) was adjusted to account for the energy loss, resulting in 34.3 J for the height calculation. The final height was computed as 28 m after correcting the energy loss percentage. The method used for the calculations was confirmed as correct, with a note on the variability of the gravitational constant affecting the exactness of the result. The discussion emphasizes the importance of careful calculation and understanding energy loss in physics problems.
Lil Uzi Vert
Messages
6
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A 125 - G arrow is shot vertically upwards with a Vi of 28/ms. Assuming a 20% loss in Mechanical Energy while ascending, what maximum height above the position it was shot does it reach?

Homework Equations


Vi= 28m/s
Vf= O m/s
D= ?
a= -9.8 m/s

Vf^2= Vi^2 + 2aD
Eg = mgh
Ek = 1/2mv^2
EM = Eg + Ek (not sure}

The Attempt at a Solution


I did not really understand this question but I tried to make a solution using what I know.
I tried using one of the 5 equations but that did not help so i tried using work and energy equations.

So i did Ek first
Ek= 1/2 mv ^2
Ek = 1/2 (0.125 kg) (28 m/s)^2
Ek = 98 J

Next I tried finding the Eg
Eg = Ek x 0.70
(30% loss of mechanical energy, this is what i am thinking)
Eg = 68.6 J

Eg = mgh
Eg= 0.125 (9.8) h
68.6 = 1.225 h
68.6/1.225= h
h= 55.51 m

Did I do this question right or wrong? I am very confused. Some help would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lil Uzi Vert said:
Assuming a 20% loss in Mechanical Energy
Lil Uzi Vert said:
30% loss of mechanical energy, this is what i am thinking
Where does the 30% come from? Your method is correct.
 
Lil Uzi Vert said:
So i did Ek first
Ek= 1/2 mv ^2
Ek = 1/2 (0.125 kg) (28 m/s)^2
Ek = 98 J
Check that calculation. Did you divide by two?
 
  • Like
Likes Lil Uzi Vert
Lil Uzi Vert said:
Did I do this question right or wrong?

Yes it's the right approach just check the working as others have suggested.
 
kuruman said:
Where does the 30% come from? Your method is correct.
i meant 30%
 
Last edited:
gneill said:
Check that calculation. Did you divide by two?
(In the post i meant 30% loss, not 20 % that's why i did multiplying by 0.7.)
I divided by two so the number is 49 J , multiplying it by 0.7 would be 34.3 J
34.3 J / 1.225 = h
H= 28 M exactly
Is this method now correct?
 
Lil Uzi Vert said:
(In the post i meant 30% loss, not 20 % that's why i did multiplying by 0.7.)
I divided by two so the number is 49 J , multiplying it by 0.7 would be 34.3 J
34.3 J / 1.225 = h
H= 28 M exactly
Is this method now correct?
Yes. Although "exactly" depends upon your choice of value for g :smile:
 
Back
Top