Calculating Mechanical Energy on a Water Slide

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the mechanical energy of a child sliding down a water slide, emphasizing the relationship between potential energy (PE) and kinetic energy (KE). At the top of the slide, the mechanical energy is derived from KE, but the initial calculation is incorrect due to misapplication of energy conservation principles. The correct approach requires evaluating mechanical energy at the same point, not mixing values from different heights. The height of the slide above the water level is also questioned, highlighting the importance of understanding energy conservation in this context. Overall, the mechanical energy remains constant unless non-conservative forces like friction are involved.
wolves5
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
A 50.8 kg child slides down a water slide with a velocity of 0.9 m/sec at the top. At the bottom of the slide, she is moving horizontally, y=2.5 meters above the water. She splashes into the water d=3 meters to the left of the bottom of the slide.

a) Assuming potential energy to be zero at the water level, what is the mechanical energy of the child at the top of the slide?

For this, ME=PE+KE. Since PE=0, ME=0+KE. So ME=0.5 (50.8) (0.9^2), but that's not right.

b) How high is the top of the slide above the bottom of the slide?
I don't know how to do this one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mechanical energy is a conserved quantity. Unless things like friction are involved (non conservative forces) but the problem would state this outright.

Therefore the mechanical energy at the bottom of the slide is the same as the top.

You are using the KE at the top of the slide plus the PE at the bottom of the slide.. that is not right, you need to add the KE and PE at the same place to find the ME.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top