Calculating Minimum Required Velocity

  • Thread starter Thread starter ByronT
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Minimum Velocity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the minimum initial velocity required for a projectile to land on top of a building located at a specific distance and height. The problem is framed as a projectile motion challenge, emphasizing the need to determine both the minimum initial velocity and the launch angle. While standard projectile equations are acknowledged, the complexity of the problem is highlighted, particularly in finding the correct parameters. One participant claims to have found a solution on Wikipedia and plans to share it after allowing others time to explore the problem. The conversation underscores the theoretical nature of the inquiry, despite it not being a requirement for any coursework.
ByronT
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
This is a tough question. I'd like to know if anybody can find a good solution. It isn't required for any of my classes, but I'd like to see a theoretical result. It seems like it should be a simple projectile motion problem, but it's not that easy.

Let's say there's a building x1 meters away and y1 meters tall. So, we only know x and y. What is the minimum initial velocity at which a projectile can be launched to "land" on top of this building? Assume that the projectile is launched from the origin.

Obviously, we know the standard projectile equations. We know the x-distance and y-distance we must travel. We know how to convert vinitial to vx and vy. But how do we find the minimum vinitial and its corresponding theta?

Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So you want the projectile to be able to stop on top of the building, not just clear it?
 
I figured it out. Found something on Wikipedia. I'll let other people look at it for a day before I post what I found.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top