Calculating Object-Lens Distance for Diverging Lens Optics

  • Thread starter Thread starter slaw155
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lens Optics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the object-lens distance for a diverging lens with a focal length of 6mm and an image magnification of 0.5. A participant initially calculated the distance as 18mm using the lens maker formula and the magnification ratio but found this incorrect. The correct distance between the object and the lens is determined to be 6mm. The importance of careful sign management in the calculations is emphasized. Ultimately, the issue was resolved with assistance from another participant.
slaw155
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Diverging lens has focal length 6mm and image magnification 0.5. What is the distance between object and lens?

I used the fact that distance image to lens/distance object to lens = 0.5 and the lens maker formula with f=-6 and combined the two formula but this gives distance = 18mm, when answer is in fact 6mm.
Where have I gone wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
slaw155 said:
Diverging lens has focal length 6mm and image magnification 0.5. What is the distance between object and lens?

I used the fact that distance image to lens/distance object to lens = 0.5 and the lens maker formula with f=-6 and combined the two formula but this gives distance = 18mm, when answer is in fact 6mm.
Where have I gone wrong?

Show your work. Take care of the signs.

ehild
 
thanks solved it
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top