Calculating orbital velocity at periastron

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the orbital velocity at periastron for a spacecraft near Sirius B, one must apply the conservation of energy principle, focusing on gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. The initial kinetic energy and gravitational potential energy can be determined with the given parameters, allowing for the calculation of kinetic energy at periastron. The discussion emphasizes that only relevant information should be considered, as potential energy depends solely on distance and kinetic energy on speed. The period of the orbit can also be derived from these calculations. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
ketkup
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


-Suppose you have traveled to Sirius B with its radius of 5,842,200 m and mass of 1.945 x 10^30 kg. You are traveling in a spaceship 100 meters long. After arriving at close to the speed of light, you slow your spacecraft down to a velocity of only 43.19km/sec at a distance of 1 million km from the center of the star. This puts you into an elliptical orbit with a periastron only 1,000 km above the star's surface. What will be your orbital velocity at periastron. Hint: use conservation of energy.

What is the period of your orbit?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I know that I am going to be finding potential and kinetic energy in order to complete this problem, but I'm not exactly sure what I am supposed to do with them.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Total energy is conserved, and the only contributions to energy here are gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. You have all the information needed to calculate the initial kinetic energy and to calculate the gravitational potential energy initially and at periastron. You can therefore calculate the kinetic energy at periastron, and thence the velocity.
 
Welcome to PF!

ketkup said:
I know that I am going to be finding potential and kinetic energy in order to complete this problem, but I'm not exactly sure what I am supposed to do with them.

Hi ketkup! Welcome to PF! :smile:

I suspect you're being put off by the fact that most of the information given is irrelevant! :rolleyes:

Hint: PE depends only on distance, and KE depends only on speed. :wink:

EDIT: rats! D H beat me to it! :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top