Calculating Particle Deceleration and Force | MCAT Physics Question 17

accol
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
1. http://www.prep101.com/MCAT/102MCATPhysicsAnswers.pdf number 17


3. Here is my attempt:

First I figure I have to find the deceleration of the particle. So I plugged it into the v(final)^2= v(initial)^2 + 2ax. I solved for a and got a and got -240000.

I don't know if I am correct here but I plugged the accel and mass into F = ma and got a force of 1.608*10^-21N

I also tried substuting equations such as =

F = Eq
to ma = Eq but I still haven't gotten an answer along the lines of the choices. Please help me.

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
accol said:
1. http://www.prep101.com/MCAT/102MCATPhysicsAnswers.pdf number 17


3. Here is my attempt:

First I figure I have to find the deceleration of the particle. So I plugged it into the v(final)^2= v(initial)^2 + 2ax. I solved for a and got a and got -240000.


You have the right idea, but I get a=-5.76 \times 10^{10} \text{m/s}^2. Double check your calculation :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lol, wow...and I thought I was doing it all wrong, I just put the wrong numbers into the calculator. Thanks
 
Welcome :smile:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top