Calculating Period of Keplerian Orbit on Mystery Planet

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mirielle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbits
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the rotation period of a mystery planet using its gravitational variations at the equator and pole. The explorer's weight changes indicate the centripetal force due to the planet's rotation, which is essential for determining the period. The equations presented involve gravitational acceleration and centripetal force, leading to the relationship between period and radius. The initial calculations yield a period of 1.59 hours, but the poster suspects an error in their approach. Suggestions include focusing on the differences in gravitational acceleration rather than the absolute values to refine the calculation.
Mirielle
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have a question on calculating the period of a planet where I know the gravity at the equator and at the pole.

Here is the known information for the planet:
Planet radius: 6502 km
Planet mass: 4.71 \ast 10^{24} kg

An explorer, who weighs 191 lbs on earth, stands at the equator of this mystery planet. He finds that he currently weighs 159 lbs.
He then moves to the north pole of the planet and finds that he weighs 105% of what he previously weighed.
The question then asks what the period of rotation for the planet is.

So, I thought the following formula would probably be useful in solving this.
v = \frac{2 \pi R}{T}
Or in this case:
T = \frac{2 \pi R}{v}
So, I already know the radius, which only leaves figuring out the velocity with which it is spinning...a_{equator}= \frac{Gm}{r^2}

a_{pole}= 1.05 a_{equator}

We also know that:
a_{centrip.}= \frac{v^2}{r}

So, now I solve for v by combining these...

\frac{1.05 GM }{r^2 }= \frac{v^2 }{r }

which gives me:

v = \sqrt{\frac{1.05 GM}{r}}

Now I plug in the following values from above:

r = 6502 km = 6502000 m

m = 4.71 \ast 10^{24} kg

(And the constant)

G = 6.673 \ast 10^{-11}

And I find that v = 7125 m/s

Now, I convert this to hours due to the period being in hours.
v = 7125 m/s = 25650000 m / hr

Then we return to this equation I presented before:

T = \frac{2 \pi R}{v}

And plugging in the values...

T = \frac{2 \pi (6502000)}{25650000} = 1.59 hr

However, this is wrong.
I'm curious to know where I'm going wrong here.

P.S. this is the first time I've ever used TeX, I hope it works properly!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Mirielle said:
Here is the known information for the planet:
Planet radius: 6502 km
Planet mass: 4.71 \ast 10^{24} kg

An explorer, who weighs 191 lbs on earth, stands at the equator of this mystery planet. He finds that he currently weighs 159 lbs.
He then moves to the north pole of the planet and finds that he weighs 105% of what he previously weighed.
The question then asks what the period of rotation for the planet is.
Suggestion: Set out the equation for T in algebraic form and then plug in numbers.

In this case, the difference between the weight at the equator and at the pole is the centripetal force due to the rotation of the planet. So you don't really have to worry about what the force of gravity is.

m\Delta g = F_c = m\omega^2r = m\frac{4\pi^2}{T^2r}

We know what his weight is on Earth and g for the earth, so we can determine his mass. From that you can determine the value for g on the equator and at the pole

\Delta g = \frac{4\pi^2}{T^2r}

1/T = \sqrt{r\Delta g/4\pi^2}

AM
 
Last edited:
The weight at that point is the sum of two forces. You tried to use centripetal force to explain the entire weight. I'll leave it up to you to fill in the rest.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top