Calculating Potential and Kinetic Energy in a Slingshot Physics Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter stanton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Slingshot
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating potential and kinetic energy in a slingshot physics problem involving a stone and rubber bands. Initially, the potential energy (PE) was incorrectly calculated as 30 J, but it was later corrected to 60 J by recognizing that both rubber bands contribute to the energy storage. The speed of the stone was initially calculated as 34.6 m/s, which also needed adjustment based on the corrected potential energy value. The final answers are confirmed as PE = 60 J and speed v = 49 m/s. The importance of correctly accounting for both rubber bands in energy calculations is emphasized.
stanton
Messages
74
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A slingshot consists of a light leather cup, containing a stone, that is pulled back against two parallel rubber bands. It takes a force of 15 N to stretch either one of these bands 1.0 cm.

(a) What is the potential energy stored in the two bands together when a 50-g stone is placed in the cup and pulled back 0.20 m from the equilibrium position?

(b) With what speed does the stone leave the slingshot?

The answers are a) PE = 60 J b) v = 49 m/s

Homework Equations



F=kx PE=1/2kx^2

The Attempt at a Solution



a)
F=kx
15 = k(0.01) → k=1500 N/m

PE = 1/2 k x^2
= 1/2 (1500)(.20)2
= 30 J

b)
PE1=KE1, KE = 1/2mv^2
1/2mv^2 = 30
1/2(0.050)v^2 = 30;
v= 34.6 m/s

Any comment or help would be appreciated about why I got the answers wrong. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, I realized what was wrong with the first question. Since there are two straps, 30 must be doubled.
 
Just remember, although you fixed your result for part A, you use it to answer part B. (In other words you have to make changes to part B as well)
 
Thank you so much. :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top