Calculating Potential Energy Change for a Mountain Climber

AI Thread Summary
The change in potential energy for a 95-kg mountain climber ascending to an elevation of 5000 m is calculated using the formula PEg = mgh, resulting in 4,655,000 Joules. This value is confirmed as correct by participants in the discussion. The significance of this energy amount is highlighted by converting it to approximately 1,060 calories, illustrating the climber's energy expenditure. Additionally, it is noted that to maintain energy balance, the climber would need to consume about 50% more than the average daily caloric intake. Understanding potential energy in this context emphasizes the physical demands of mountain climbing.
Generally Confused
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 95-kg mountain climber hikes up a mountain to an elevation of 5000 m. What is the change in the climber's potential energy?

Homework Equations


I might be missing something but here's everything that might be relevant:
w=fx
p=w/t
p=f*v
KE=1/2mv^2
PEg=mgh
PEe=1/2kx^2
Wnet=E

The Attempt at a Solution


I plugged the numbers into the gravitational potential energy equation and got 4,655,000J. Is this correct? If not, what am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is correct. Incidentally, this shows how large (or small) a Joule is.
 
An interesting perspective is to convert this to about 106 calories. At a resting dietary requirement of 2000 kilocalories per day, the walker would need to eat 50% extra.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top