Calculating Potential Energy Changes in a Roller Coaster System

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the gravitational potential energy (GPE) changes of an 800 kg roller-coaster car moving from point A to point B. The initial calculations presented are incorrect, particularly in the use of the angle and the height change. The correct height change is determined to be 9.6 meters, which should be used in the GPE formula. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly interpreting the angle and height in the calculations to arrive at the right potential energy values. Accurate application of these concepts is crucial for determining the energy changes in the roller coaster system.
Tmtamrak
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
A 800 kg roller-coaster car is initially at the top of a rise, at point A. It then moves 135 ft, at an angle of 40.0° below the horizontal, to a lower point B.
(a) Choose the car at point B to be the zero configuration for gravitational potential energy of the roller coaster-Earth system. Find the potential energy of the system when the car is at points A and B, and the change in potential energy as the coaster moves.



GPE = mgy cos theta


This is my attempt to solve, however I keep getting that my answer is wrong.
(800kg)(9.8)(41.15m)x cos 40 =247,138.19J

Can someone please let me know what is incorrect in my process?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tmtamrak said:
A 800 kg roller-coaster car is initially at the top of a rise, at point A. It then moves 135 ft, at an angle of 40.0° below the horizontal, to a lower point B.
(a) Choose the car at point B to be the zero configuration for gravitational potential energy of the roller coaster-Earth system. Find the potential energy of the system when the car is at points A and B, and the change in potential energy as the coaster moves.



GPE = mgy cos theta


This is my attempt to solve, however I keep getting that my answer is wrong.
(800kg)(9.8)(41.15m)x cos 40 =247,138.19J

Can someone please let me know what is incorrect in my process?

Suppose that the angle is zero degrees below the horizontal. What would be the height change?

Now put zero into your formula instead of 40.

Why is it different? Just becos.
 
The height changes by 9.6m...

If I do (800kg)(9.8)(41.15m) = 322,616J
.. but that is not the correct answer either.
 
Tmtamrak said:
The height changes by 9.6m...

If I do (800kg)(9.8)(41.15m) = 322,616J
.. but that is not the correct answer either.

0 degrees from horizontal is horizontal...
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top