Calculating Probability of Non-Capturing Rooks on a Chessboard

fk378
Messages
366
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If 8 rooks (castles) are randomly places on a chessboard, compute the probability that none of the rooks can capture any of the others. That is, compute the probability that no row or file contains more than one rook.


The Attempt at a Solution


I just started it by knowing there are 64 squares on a chessboard. If there are 8 rooks, then that leaves 56 empty blocks.

Where to go from here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How many different ways to put the rooks on the board without the no-capture restriction? How many ways with the restriction?
 
no-capture restriction: 8! ways
without the restriction: 56! ways
 
Not to give it away, but so you can check: P(no capture) \approx .911\times 10^{-5}.
 
I don't understand how that is? Can you explain?
 
Can you start by explaining why you think 56! is the number of ways to place them without restriction? That is certainly wrong.
 
First, place a rook in a random spot on the board. How many ways are there to do this? Next, figure out how many places are left on the board where the second rook can't take the first rook. Now, how many ways are there to place another rook on the board so that it can't take either of the first two. Continue this until you get to the last rook (there should only be one space left for that one). Finally, figure out how many possible ways there are to place the 8 rooks on the board with no restrictions.
 
2w7mm89.jpg


So you need one rook in one row.

P(A)=\frac{m}{n}

8th row - the rook can move on 8! ways

Can you find the probability now?

Notice: you got 8 rooks so n=8 * ?
 
fk378 said:

Homework Statement


If 8 rooks (castles) are randomly places on a chessboard, compute the probability that none of the rooks can capture any of the others. That is, compute the probability that no row or file contains more than one rook.

The first sentence is not equivalent to the second. :-p
 
  • #10
epenguin said:
The first sentence is not equivalent to the second. :-p

Why not?
 
  • #11
Because capture possibility depends on the colour of the rooks. :smile:
 
Back
Top