Calculating Pump Motor Output: Where Did I Go Wrong?

  • Thread starter Thread starter strugglin-physics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Joules Watts
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the required output rating for a pump motor lifting 16.0 kg of water through a height of 3.38 m per minute, only the change in potential energy needs to be considered, not kinetic energy. The formula for potential energy is mgh, where m is mass, g is gravitational acceleration, and h is height. The total energy required to lift the water is calculated as 16 kg * 9.8 m/s² * 3.38 m. This energy must be divided by 60 seconds to find the power in watts, as power is defined as energy per unit time. The initial negative output indicates a miscalculation, emphasizing the importance of focusing solely on potential energy in this scenario.
strugglin-physics
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
A pump is to lift 16.0 kg of water per minute through a height of 3.38 m. What output rating (watts) should the pump motor have?

Potential Energy Initial = O
Kenetic Energy Final = 0

So,
KE-PE = W
1/2mv^2 - mgh = Work
1/2(16.0)(3.38)^2 - (16.0)(9.8)(3.38) = -439 W

The fact that my answer is negative automatically tells me that I did something wrong as the pump wouldn't have a negative output. Does anyone see where I went wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no kinetic energy involved in this problem at all, so that's your first trouble spot. The only thing that matters is the change in potential energy of the water when lifted 3.38 meters.

The pump has to lift 16 kg 3.38 m every minute. It has to expend energy to do this. It requires m g y joules to lift a mass of any substance y meters:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=16+kg+*+9.8+m/s/s+*+3.38+m&btnG=Google+Search

This energy is expended over the course of a minute; the pump thus has to expend a sixtienth of this energy per second. Power, in watts, is equivalent to one joule per second:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=(16+kg+*+9.8+m/s/s+*+3.38+m)+/+60+seconds&btnG=Search

- Warren
 
Wow, I was way off. Thanks for your help, it helped me with another problem I was stuck on to.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top