Calculating Radioactive Decay: Estimating Age of Ancient City

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the age of an ancient city using radioactive decay principles, specifically focusing on carbon-14 dating. The original poster presents a scenario involving a charcoal sample and its decay activity to estimate the time since the city's destruction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the radioactive decay formula and discusses the decay constant and half-life of carbon-14. Participants raise questions about the initial activity of carbon-14 and the validity of using specific values from textbooks. There is also a focus on unit consistency and the implications of different time units in calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide feedback on the approach taken by the original poster, with one confirming the method's correctness while others seek clarification on specific values and assumptions. Multiple interpretations regarding the initial activity of carbon-14 and its applicability are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of verifying the initial activity value of carbon-14 in charcoal and question whether the textbook value of 255 Bq/kg is universally applicable. There is an emphasis on ensuring unit compatibility throughout the calculations.

ussrasu
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Q: A 50-g chunk of charcoal is found in the buried remains of an ancient city destroyed by invaders. The carbon-14 activity of the sample is 200 decays/min. Roughly when was the city destroyed?

A: I used R = Ro*e^(-lambda*t) and t1/2 = ln2/lambda

t1/2 = 3.834*10^-12 s-1

and 200 decays/min = 3.33 decays/sec or 3.33 Bq

What is the initial acitivity/kg (Ro)?
The final acitivty/kg = 3.33 Bq/0.05 Kg = 66.66 Bq/Kg

Therefore R/Ro = 66.66/255

I then found the time to be 11 088 years

Can someone please check over this and see if this looks correct and advise of any corrections?

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't check the numbers (for instance, is the initial activity of C-14 255 Bq/kg ?) but the approach seems totally correct.

cheers,
Patrick.
 
What half-life of C-14 is used?

Be careful with units. t1/2 should have units of time.

1 Bq = 1 decay/s is correct.

The decay constant \lambda = ln 2 / t1/2, and customarily it is often expressed as s-1, but it should be compatible with whatever units (s, hr, days) are used for time, t.

I calculate a decay constant of 3.9455E-12 s-1.

Activity A(t) = Ao exp(-\lambdat)

So inital activity is A(t) exp (\lambdat).

So to solve the problem, one needs to know the normal specific activity for C-14 in charcoal. Where did 255 Bq/kg originate?

255/66.66 = 3.825 half-lives.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nuclear/halfli2.html

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nuclear/halfli.html

Useful calculator - http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nuclear/raddec.html#c1
 
In the textbook in a previous example - it says that the C-14 activity in a living tree is 255 Bq - that is where i got that value from but i wasnt sure if i could use that value in this question - ie is it always 255 Bq in living trees?!?

The half-life is in s^-1 - therefore the answer would be in seconds and i just converted it back to years in the answer.

Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
14K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K