Calculating radioactivity after a period of time

FollowTheFez
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



QUESTION
A cancer patient is typically given an intravenous dose of Metastron with an activity of
148 MBq.
Calculate the activity after 6 months (183 days).

PREVIOUS INFORMATION
Physical half-life of Metastron = 50.5 days
Biological half-life of Metastron = 1.8x104 days



Homework Equations



T1/2 = \frac{ln2}{λ}

\frac{ΔN}{Δt} = λN

N = N0e-λt



The Attempt at a Solution



The equation used to calculate the activity would be
N = N0e-λt

N0 = 148MBq
t = 183days

So I just need to find λ. - This is where I think I am going wrong.

λ = \frac{ln2}{T}
λ = \frac{0.693}{50.5days}
λ = 1.59x10-7

Substituting this into the first equation gets...

N = N0e-λt
N = 148 e-(1.59x10-7) x 183
N = 147.996MBq
N = 148MBq

The correct answer is (apparently) 11.95MBq.
Seeing as all values are in MBq and days, I don't think I have to convert to Bq and seconds (actually even if I do convert I still get an incorrect answer).
Therefore I think I am stuffing up at my calculation of λ. But I don't see any other way in which I can calculate it. Am I correct in thinking this is where I am going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  1. You are pressing the wrong buttons on your calculator: ## \frac{ln2}{50.5} \approx 0.013726 ## which would give an answer of 12.01MBq.
  2. You are ignoring the biological half life; treating this correctly gives an answer of 11.92MBq if 6 months is taken as 183 days, or 12.00MBq after 365/2 = 182.5 days.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top