Calculating Ratio of Electron and Positive Ion Mean Free Paths in an Ionised Gas

RichRobX
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Question goes as follows:

"In an ionised gas there are positive ions and electrones moving around in collision with molecules of the gas. Calculate the ratio of the mean free path of the electrons in the gas to the mean free path of the positive ions in the gas."


As far as I can see I only need
lamda = (KT)/(4pi root2 r^2 p)

where everything will cancel except r giving r1:r2 ratio

I could assume r is roughly 1x10^-10 for the molecules, but I don't think I'm supposed to know or find r for the electron since the compton radius ( (e^2/(me c^2) ) is a little beyond what we've done.


What have i missed..?

- Rob
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi RichBoxX,

The r in your mean free path formula refers to the radius of the molecules with which the electrons collide. See here for details: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kinetic/menfre.html

If the gas is only somewhat ionized, the mean free path is dominated by collisions of electrons with non-ionized molecules and you can ignore the collisions of electrons with positive ions.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top