Calculating Reactions in 4-Reaction Beam

  • Thread starter Thread starter bumfluff
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Reactions
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the load taken by each reaction force on a beam with four reaction forces, one must recognize that the system is statically indeterminate due to having more unknowns than equations. Simple moment calculations about a single point are insufficient for such configurations. Instead, assumptions about the elastic properties of the beam or the supporting strings are necessary to derive the forces. For instance, if the beam is suspended from four identical springs, the relationship between force and extension can be used to formulate equations based on the beam's deflection and angle. Solving these equations can be complex, requiring careful consideration of the system's mechanics.
bumfluff
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
If you have a beam with 4 reaction forces, how do you calculate the load taken by each reaction? It occurs to me that you cannot simply take moments about one point so what is the method you can use to find the reactions? I made one example where the beam was symmetrical so I tried equating it to a beam supported at two points but it seems to me that the way I did this would not work for a beam where there is no symmetry.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A beam with four (even with three) forces is said to be "statically indeterminate" because there are 4 unknowns and only two equations. In order to get an answer you have to make some assumption about the elastic properties of either the beam or the strings supporting it.
 
Would you be able to elaborate on the the assumptions of elastic properties that you would have to make?
 
As an example: If the bar is suspended from four identical springs, such that F=kx, where x is the extension in length of the spring, you can get an equation for the forces in terms of the distance the beam drops, and the angle it makes with the horizontal. This could be solved for the four forces. It is not easy.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top