Calculating Rotor Revolutions for Space Probe Orientation Change

  • Thread starter Thread starter GingerBread27
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Revolutions Rotor
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the number of rotor revolutions needed for a space probe to change its orientation by 30 degrees, utilizing the conservation of angular momentum. The rotational inertia of the rotor is given as 2.5 x 10^-3 kg·m², while the probe's rotational inertia is 8 kg·m². Participants confirm that the calculation yields 266.67 revolutions for the rotor to achieve the desired orientation change. The conversation also touches on the ease of obtaining help through instant messaging for homework assistance. Overall, the method discussed is effective for students seeking to understand the physics involved in space probe orientation changes.
GingerBread27
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
The rotor of an electric motor has rotational inertia I am = 2.5*10-3 kg · m2 about its central axis. The motor is used to change the orientation of the space probe in which it is mounted. The motor axis is mounted along the central axis of the probe. The probe has rotational inertia Ip = 8 kg · m2 about this axis. Calculate the number of revolutions of the rotor required to turn the probe through 30° about its axis.

Not sure where to start, except that you have to use the idea of conservation of angular momentum.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(Ip*(degrees/360))/Im I am telling you, if you just send me an instant message, we've done the uf homework, you can get help from me on there... or just keep posting here... whatevers easier i guess
 
so it did work? that why you deleted your post?
its 266.67, and it does work, its worked for every uf student I've shown that to
 
yeah it worked lol
 
heh, good, i was wondering there for a minute...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top