Calculating SAR from multiple sources

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wotwot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Multiple Sources
AI Thread Summary
The Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) is calculated using the formula SAR = (sigma * Erms^2) / p, where sigma is conductivity, Erms is the RMS electric field, and p is density. To calculate total SAR from multiple sources at the same frequency, the correct approach is to first calculate the total electric field at the location, then determine its RMS value for use in the SAR equation. This is necessary because the square of the sum of electric fields differs from the sum of their squares, leading to different SAR values. If the sources operate at different frequencies, the method remains the same, as electric fields can interfere constructively or destructively. Therefore, method one is confirmed as the accurate way to calculate total SAR in this scenario.
Wotwot
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The Specific Absorption Rate (the rate at which energy is absorbed by a unit mass) given in W/kg is calculated by the following equation

SAR = (sigma * Erms^2) / p

Where sigma is the conductivity of the material (given in S/m), Erms is the RMS electric field (V/m) at the location and p is the density of the material (kg/m^3)

If there were multiple sources radiating the body from different places, all of them with the same frequency, and I wanted to calculate the total SAR at a specific location within the body, how would I go about doing that?
I have three options here.

1) Calculate the total electric field at the location and then calculate its RMS value and use it in the above equation

2) Calculate the SAR due to each source separately by using the Erms values due to each source and then add all the SAR values together

3) Add all the Erms values due to all the sources together and use this new Erms value in the above equation to find SAR

The above two methods give two different answers because of the fact that:

(a+b)^2 is not the same as (a^2 + b^2)

Does my choice of method change if all the sources have different frequencies?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
As electric field is a vector quantity, it can be either constructive or destructive at a particular point if radiated from two or more sources. So, the method 1) will give the right SAR amount.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top