Calculating Scale Reading in an Accelerating Elevator

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the scale reading in an accelerating elevator, first determine the acceleration using Newton's second law by considering the net force on the combined mass of the woman, elevator, and scale. The force applied by the hoisting cable is 9750 N, and the total mass is 867.5 kg (52.5 kg for the woman plus 815 kg for the elevator and scale). After finding the acceleration, apply Newton's second law again specifically to the woman to find the normal force, which represents the scale reading during acceleration. Clarification on the terms used, such as "Fn," is essential for accurate calculations. This approach will yield the correct scale reading during the elevator's upward acceleration.
IShouldBSurfing
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello! This is my first time posting here! I'm so glad I found this site, it's helped a lot already just by reading other people's questions! But now I have my own -
A woman stands on a scale in a moving elevator. Her mass is 52.5 kg, and the combined mass of the elevator and scale is an additional 815 kg. Starting from rest, the elevator accelerates upward. During the acceleration, the hoisting cable applies a force of 9750 N. What does the scale read during the acceleration?

I thought that I would find acceleration by using a=Fn/m and then putting acceleration into Fn=mg+ma.. but I can't seem to get the right answer.. help please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
IShouldBSurfing said:
I thought that I would find acceleration by using a=Fn/m and then putting acceleration into Fn=mg+ma.. but I can't seem to get the right answer.. help please?
Welcome to PF!

Those equations seem to contradict each other! :smile: Since I don't know what you mean by "Fn" (normal force? net force?), I can't tell which is correct.

In any case, do this: First find the acceleration by considering the net force on the combined mass of "woman + elevator + scale" and applying Newton's 2nd law to that. Then apply Newton's 2nd law to the woman alone, making use of the acceleration you already found.
 
yay

thank you so much!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top