Calculating Schwarzschild Radius at Galaxy's Core

  • Thread starter Thread starter mantillab
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Core
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the Schwarzschild radius for a massive object at the Milky Way's core, believed to be a black hole. The formula used is R_S = [2Gm]/c^2, with given constants for mass, gravitational constant, and the speed of light. The initial calculations yielded incorrect results, including 1.89 x 10^19 m and 1.90 x 10^19 m. A participant identified a mistake in the calculation, noting that the division was performed by c instead of c^2. This highlights the importance of careful application of formulas in astrophysical calculations.
mantillab
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Astronomers have observed a small, massive object at the center of our Milky Way galaxy. A ring of material orbits this massive object; the ring has a diameter of about 15 light years and an orbital speed of about 200 km/s. Take the distance of one light year to be 9.461 X 10^15 m. Mass of object = 4.26 X 10^37 kg. Speed of light (c) = 3 X 10^8 m/s. G = 6.67 x 10^(-11).

Many astronomers believe that the massive object at the center of the Milky Way galaxy is a black hole. If so, what is its Schwarzschild radius R_S?

Homework Equations



From Wikipedia, I got the equation for the Schwarzschild radius to be R_S = [2Gm]/c^2.

The Attempt at a Solution



Using the above equation and the above constants, I got 1.89 x 10^19 m, which is wrong.

Other wrong answers: 1.90×10^19 and 1.89x10^35.

Any help would be appreciated! Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well it looks like you divided by c instead of c^2.
 
Doh! Thanks so much.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top