Calculating second moment of area of L section

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the second moment of area for an L-shaped cross-section to compare theoretical results with experimental buckling data. The original poster expresses uncertainty about their calculations and seeks assistance in verifying their method. A key point raised is the importance of calculating the second moment of area with respect to the weak axis, as this is crucial for accurate buckling analysis. The use of Mohr's circle is suggested to determine the maximum and minimum moments of inertia. Ultimately, the poster indicates they have resolved their issue and appreciate the help received.
wicz
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

I currently trying to calculate the second moment of area of an L shaped cross section.
The reason for this is I have carried out a buckling experiment on a strut of this cross section and want to calculate some theoretical results to compare to my experimental results.
I need the second moment of area so I can use Euler's equation and calculate the axial load on the strut.

I have attached my workings for the second moment of area, but in all honesty I do not think my method is correct. It would be very helpful if someone wouldn't mind looking over my calculations and point out where I have gone wrong. It would be very much appreciated!

Thanks

Max
 

Attachments

  • ScannedImage.jpg
    ScannedImage.jpg
    27 KB · Views: 948
  • ScannedImage-2.jpg
    ScannedImage-2.jpg
    30.2 KB · Views: 790
  • ScannedImage-3.jpg
    ScannedImage-3.jpg
    28.1 KB · Views: 686
Engineering news on Phys.org
Have just realized it is not clear on my diagram that the dimensions of the cross section are in mm.
 
At the risk of being caught talking to myself...

I think I may have figured this out, I've attached a print screen of an excel spreadsheet I used to do the calculations.
Obviously because its excel you can't see my workings, but maybe you can tell if my values look correct?
 

Attachments

  • buckling excel.jpg
    buckling excel.jpg
    46.1 KB · Views: 742
It appears that you have set up to calculate second moments with respect to centroidal axes parallel to the axes (this is an obvious thing to do). Your strut will not buckle on these axes, however. It will buckle on the weak axis, which is the axis of minimum area moment of inertia. You need to take the values you obtain and go into a Mohr's circle calculation to obtain the max and min values of the MOI. This will give you the value you need to compare to your experimental work.
 
Thanks for your help, all sorted now :)
 
I have Mass A being pulled vertically. I have Mass B on an incline that is pulling Mass A. There is a 2:1 pulley between them. The math I'm using is: FA = MA / 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If MB is greater then FA, it pulls FA up as MB moves down the incline. BUT... If I reverse the 2:1 pulley. Then the math changes to... FA = MA * 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If FA is greater then MB, it pulls MB up the incline as FA moves down. It's confusing...
Hi. I noticed that all electronic devices in my household that also tell time eventually lag behind, except the ones that get synchronized by radio signal or internet. Most of them are battery-powered, except my alarm clock (which runs slow as well). Why does none of them run too fast? Deliberate design (why)? Wrong temperature for quartz crystal? Decreasing battery voltage? Or just a coincidence?
Back
Top