Calculating Speed and Direction of Sailboat After Gust of Wind

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the speed and direction of a sailboat after a gust of wind. The initial speed is 5 m/s east, with an acceleration of 0.80 m/s² at 40 degrees north of east. To find the boat's speed after 6 seconds, the acceleration must be broken into east and north components. The correct approach involves calculating the final velocity components separately and then combining them to determine the resultant speed and direction. The initial calculations incorrectly assumed the acceleration was perpendicular to the velocity, leading to inaccurate results.
Kster
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
A sailboat is traveling east at 5m/s . A sudden gust of wind gives the boat an acceleration=.80 m/s^2, (40 degrees north of east).

A. What is the boat's speed 6 seconds later when the gust subsides?
________m/s

B. What is the boat's direction 6 seconds later when the gust subsides?
________degrees north of east.


My attempts:
v = v0 + at
v = (0) + (0.80m/s^2)* (6sec)
v = 4.8m/s

A^2+ B^2 = C^2
(4.8)^2 + (5.0)^2 = 48.04
C= 6.9 m/s
_____________________

tan-1 (4.8/5.0) = 44°


Please tell me what I did wrong? I am so stuck :(
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Kster said:
A^2+ B^2 = C^2
(4.8)^2 + (5.0)^2 = 48.04
C= 6.9 m/s
This assumes that the acceleration is perpendicular to the original velocity (east). But it's not: the acceleration is 40 degrees north of east.

Hint: Break the acceleration (and the velocity) into components (east and north). Find the final velocity component east and the final velocity component north, then you can combine them to find the final speed.

Another approach is to find the change in velocity along the direction of the acceleration, which will be some vector 40 degrees north of east. Then just add that vector to the initial velocity vector and find the new magnitude.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top