Calculating Strength of Electromagnets

burnit
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Hi,

This is not homework, I'm just confused:

I have been asking on the electrical engineering forum about calculating the strength of electromagnets.

After some searching i have found the equations but i just can't quite get a handle on some of it?

They have an iron core C shaped electromagnet 15cm long & 1cm square in area.

They write: The reluctance of the air gap is 1 centimeter divided by 1 times 1 square centimeter.

The answer they have is 100 henries per meter.

How do they calculate this to get 100 as the answer?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I forgot to add that the air gap is 1cm & the permeability of air is 1 in this example.

Thanks
 
Ok, i'll have a go at it, the equation is:

(1 centimeter) / (1 * 1 (square centimeter)) = 100 m-1

I noticed that Reluctance is in Henries per Meter but the above calculation is in Centimeters so i assume the answers i have been getting are actually Henries per Centimeter, do i simply multiply the answer by 100 to change it to meters & then the answer is in Henries per meter & seem correct?.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top