Calculating Tangential Acceleration of a Particle on a Flywheel

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the tangential acceleration of a particle on a flywheel with a constant angular speed of 137 rev/min that comes to rest in 2.7 hours. The main equation used is a_t = rα, where the angular acceleration α needs to be converted from rev/min to radians/min^2 for accurate results. Participants point out that the provided angular speed of 68.5 rev/min is not necessary for calculating tangential acceleration during deceleration. The importance of correctly applying the conversion factor of 2π to express angular measurements in radians is emphasized. Overall, the conversation highlights common pitfalls in unit conversion and the relevance of each parameter in the calculation.
vertex78
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The flywheel of a steam engine runs with a constant angular speed of 137 rev/min. When steam is shut off, the friction of the bearings and the air brings the wheel to rest in 2.7 h.

What is the magnitude of the tangential component of the linear acceleration of a particle that is located at a distance of 55 cm from the axis of rotation when the flywheel is turning at 68.5 rev/min?


Homework Equations


a_t = r\alpha


The Attempt at a Solution


\alpha = ((137 rev/min) /(2.7h*(60m/1h)) * 2PI = 0.845679 rev/min^2

a_t = .55m * 0.845679

I know I am not doing this correctly, I don't understand how to tie in the 68.5rev/min into the equation for the tangential component
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In your first equation, it looks like you multiplied by 2pi to put it into radians, but you didn't carry the 2pi through the actual calculation, and then you still stated it in rev/min. :confused:
Why do you think your reasoning (other than what I mentioned above) isn't correct?
 
Last edited:
vertex78 said:

Homework Equations


a_t = r\alpha
This is only true when the angular displacement is measured in radians (not revolutions). Linear acceleration is measured in terms of distance per time-squared.


The Attempt at a Solution


\alpha = ((137 rev/min) /(2.7h*(60m/1h)) * 2PI = 0.845679 rev/min^2
I see a 2 PI term in there (good!), but you failed to use it. If you had used it, your angular acceleration would be in radians/min^2. (Since 1 revolution = 2 PI radians.)

a_t = .55m * 0.845679
When you recalculate the angular acceleration in terms of radians/min^2, this will give you the tangential acceleration in m/min^2.

I know I am not doing this correctly, I don't understand how to tie in the 68.5rev/min into the equation for the tangential component
The 68.5rev/min seems to be extraneous information. :wink: (But it does let you know that you are to find the tangential acceleration during the time that the flywheel is slowing down.)
 
Ok my bad on the angular acceleration equation I wrote, I am not sure what I was thinking, I had it written down on paper correctly, somehow I added in a 2PI into the equation I was using. For another question for the same problem I had to find the angular accleration in rev/min^2. So that also ended up being my mistake, I was not converting it to rad/min^2 before using it to find tangential velocity.

Thanks for the help!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top