Calculating tangential velocity of an air parcel circulating a tornado

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the tangential velocity of an air parcel near a tornado, specifically comparing velocities at different distances from the center. The key equation used is v = rω, where ω is the angular velocity, which remains constant regardless of radius. The calculation shows that at 100m from the tornado center, the tangential velocity is 0.5 m/s, slower than at 2000m, which contradicts initial expectations. This is explained by the fact that the inner parcel travels a smaller radius, requiring less speed to maintain its circular path. The analogy of runners on a track illustrates that those on the outer lanes must run faster than those on the inner lanes.
Timebomb3750
Messages
59
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If an air parcel 2000m from a tornado center has a tangential velocity of 10 m/s, what is the resultant tangential velocity if the parcel is 100m from the tornado center.

Homework Equations



v = rω, where r = radius, and ω = angular velocity
ω = v/r

The Attempt at a Solution



I understand that the tangential velocity of the air parcel should be much faster as radius drops. But how am I supposed to calculate tangential velocity of it requires the calculation of angular velocity which requires velocity. I'm really lost.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Angular Velocity is not dependant on radius, therefore, it will be the same for each radius. You can find angular velocity with the equation ω = v/r. Use that value to find the tangential velocity at the new radius.
 
NewtonsHead said:
Angular Velocity is not dependant on radius, therefore, it will be the same for each radius. You can find angular velocity with the equation ω = v/r. Use that value to find the tangential velocity at the new radius.

Okay, here's my work.

ω = 10 (m/s)/ 2000m = .005 radians/sec

Then I put that into the tangential velocity question:

v = rω = 100m*.005 radians/sec = .5 m/s

Why is it that the tangential velocity got slower as radius decreased? I thought it was the other way around as I mentioned in my first post.
 
The tangential velocity is slower near the center of the disk because it doesn't have to circle around as big of a radius as the outside. Imagine running around a circular track... the people on the outside have to run faster to keep up with the people on the inside lanes. This is not true for planets though, because the inner planets are affected by the sun's gravity more and travel faster in the tangential direction to maintain their orbits.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top