Calculating the Angle Between a Force and Displacement

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the angle between a 13 N force and a displacement of (3i - 5j + 3k) m, the dot product formula is essential, which relates the work done to the magnitudes of the vectors and the cosine of the angle. The work done on the particle can be either +25.6 J or -25.6 J, indicating that the angle will differ based on the kinetic energy change. The dot product can be expressed as F·d = |F||d|cos(θ), allowing for the calculation of the angle θ. Understanding the components of the force and displacement vectors is crucial for applying this formula correctly. This approach effectively determines the angle between the force and displacement vectors.
TomFoolery
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 13 N force with a fixed orientation does work on a particle as the particle moves through displacement = (3i - 5j + 3k) m. What is the angle between the force and the displacement if the change in the particle's kinetic energy is (a) +25.6 J and (b) -25.6 J?


Homework Equations



Angle = √(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)
Work = mad or F (dot) d

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not sure how to approach this. I know that the dot product really just means to multiply the x parts by x parts, y parts by y parts, and z parts by z parts (or \hat{i}, \hat{j}, and \hat{k} parts, if you prefer).

If the particle starts at (0, 0, 0), then the force would have caused it to go to its current position (3, -5, 3). I'm still not sure that is what is being said though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is another way to express the dot product, \vec{F}\cdot\vec{d}\,.

It involves the magnitude of each of the vectors as well as the cosine of the angle between their directions.
 
Yes, work is equal to Fx*dx+Fy*dy+Fz*dz where where Fx,Fy,Fz are the force components and dx,dy,dz are the displacement components...but there is another common way to write the the dot product of two vectors that should make quick work of this problem.
 
Got it, thanks for your help.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top