Calculating the Angle Between a Force and Displacement

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the angle between a 13 N force and a displacement of (3i - 5j + 3k) m, the dot product formula is essential, which relates the work done to the magnitudes of the vectors and the cosine of the angle. The work done on the particle can be either +25.6 J or -25.6 J, indicating that the angle will differ based on the kinetic energy change. The dot product can be expressed as F·d = |F||d|cos(θ), allowing for the calculation of the angle θ. Understanding the components of the force and displacement vectors is crucial for applying this formula correctly. This approach effectively determines the angle between the force and displacement vectors.
TomFoolery
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 13 N force with a fixed orientation does work on a particle as the particle moves through displacement = (3i - 5j + 3k) m. What is the angle between the force and the displacement if the change in the particle's kinetic energy is (a) +25.6 J and (b) -25.6 J?


Homework Equations



Angle = √(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)
Work = mad or F (dot) d

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not sure how to approach this. I know that the dot product really just means to multiply the x parts by x parts, y parts by y parts, and z parts by z parts (or \hat{i}, \hat{j}, and \hat{k} parts, if you prefer).

If the particle starts at (0, 0, 0), then the force would have caused it to go to its current position (3, -5, 3). I'm still not sure that is what is being said though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is another way to express the dot product, \vec{F}\cdot\vec{d}\,.

It involves the magnitude of each of the vectors as well as the cosine of the angle between their directions.
 
Yes, work is equal to Fx*dx+Fy*dy+Fz*dz where where Fx,Fy,Fz are the force components and dx,dy,dz are the displacement components...but there is another common way to write the the dot product of two vectors that should make quick work of this problem.
 
Got it, thanks for your help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top