Calculating the charge distribution on the surface of an assymetric conductor

Chitran
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
How do I calculate the charge distribution on the surface of any asymmetric closed conducting surface? Is it possible for me to calculate the surface charge density 'σ' as a function of '\bar{r}' the position vector in a spherical co-ordinate system in space, provided I know that the conductor has been qiven a net charge 'Q' and the equation of the conductor in space is ((x/a)^2)+((y/b)^2)+((z/c)^2)=1...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For any conducting surface you will have to resort to an approximation.

In brief: use a numerical method to establish the Electric field for the system. Use that E field result to establish surface charge distribution.
 
But how do I calculate \bar{E} if I don't know my σ? It's like the chicken egg problem except that it's not what comes first that matters, but I need one to know the other. All I know unfortunately is the shape of the conductor and the total charge Q which according to the uniqueness theorum has a unique way of settling on the surface in the abscence of any external electric field...
 
you don't need to know anything about the charge. Field lines are normal to a conducting surface and themselves normal to equipotentials. This means that you can set up a grid with random starting values for potential and by recalculating each value in turn end up closer to the correct solution.

a quick google gave this http://www.physics.hku.hk/~phys3231/pdf/P1%20-%20Static%20Electric%20Field%20-%20Laplaces%20equation%20in%202D.pdf The 3d process is very similar.

Also http://www.ece.msstate.edu/~donohoe/ece3323analytical_numerical_techniques.pdf you need the last few pages.

The procedure looks hard but really isn't: Though it is a long time since I last did one!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just solve Laplace's equation for the potential. You know that the potential on the surface is a constant (which you may as well set to zero) and that the potential at large distances should look like that of a point charge, so you have your 2 boundary conditions. From the potential, you can determine the charge density.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top