Calculating the Frequency of a Tuning Fork Using Resonance Tube Method

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the frequency of a tuning fork using the resonance tube method, with air column lengths of 48.5 cm and 68.7 cm at 26˚C. The speed of sound in air is approximated at 346.6 m/s, and the wavelength is determined to be half the difference between the two resonance lengths. The formula for the speed of sound is provided, linking it to temperature, and the relationship between frequency and wavelength is highlighted. The calculated frequency of the tuning fork is approximately 857.4 Hz. Understanding whether the tube is open or closed is noted as a potential factor in the calculations.
Shackleford
Messages
1,649
Reaction score
2
6. A tuning fork is heard to resonate over a resonance tube when the
air column is 48.5 cm long and again when it is 68.7 cm long. What is
the frequency of the tuning fork if the temperature is 26˚C?

I couldn't figure out how to work this. I thought it mattered if it were in a closed or open pipe, which is not mentioned.

v = 346.6 m/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I had a problem that was similar to this...if I recall correctly, lambda was .5(D2-D1). So lambda is half the distance between resonances.

>_> However, I am not an expert and could very easily be wrong.
 


Foxhound101 said:
I had a problem that was similar to this...if I recall correctly, lambda was .5(D2-D1). So lambda is half the distance between resonances.

>_> However, I am not an expert and could very easily be wrong.

Don't I have to know if it's open or closed?
 


lambda = 2 (l2 - l2) - .404 m

v = 346.4 ms^-1

f = 857.4 Hz
 


First you ll need to get the v-air which is given by: v = (332.5)(squareroot(T/273))
where T is the temperature in Kelvin. After that you know that v = f x lambda, and now i think: Ln+1 - Ln = 1/2 lambda.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top