Calculating the Height of a Tower Using Projectile Motion

AI Thread Summary
A rock is thrown upward, passing the top of a tower at 1.5 seconds and reaching its maximum height 1 second later. The height of the tower can be calculated using the equations of motion, specifically h = v₀t - 1/2gt², where v₀ is the initial velocity. After correcting a mistake in time calculation, the initial velocity was found to be 24.5 m/s, leading to a tower height of 30.625 meters. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using the correct time interval for accurate results. Overall, the calculations demonstrate the application of projectile motion principles to determine the height of the tower.
Kp0684
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
A rock is thrown vertically upward from ground level at time t=0. At time t=1.5s it passes the top of a tall tower, and 1.0s later t reaches its maximum height. What is the height of the tower? ... is this the equation i would use... delta(Y)= Vo(t) + 1/2(a)(t2)...with Vo= 0 , t=1.5, a= 9.8m/s2...with delta(Y) in Height...= 11.025meters...need help on this one :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use this equation
v_{fin}=v_{0}-gt

to find the initial velocity (which is not zero),knowing the total time of flight...
Then this
h=v_{0}t-\frac{1}{2}gt^{2}

to find the height...

Daniel.
 
hey thanks so much for helping me out...for the answer i got h= 30.625m...iam not sure if that's the answer you would have got...but this is my setup... Vo= V + gt... i got 24.5m/s2...then i used Vo-1/2gt2...which i got it to be = 30.625m...

Thank you for your help...

Krishna Patel
 
Do u agree that
h_{tower}=24.5\frac{m}{s}\cdot 1.5s-\frac{1}{2}9.8\frac{m}{s^{2}}\cdot (1.5s)^{2}

??

Do you understand what i did??

Daniel.
 
yeah i see what i did wrong i plugged in 2.5s...instead of 1.5 which it took the time to pass the tower...i thought it would be the where it reaches its max height for time...but i see how its done...thanks so much...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top