Calculating the mass of matter required to accelerate a spaceship

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the mass of matter and antimatter required to accelerate a 23,000-metric-ton spaceship to 0.03 c, the relevant equations are E=mc^2 for energy and relativistic kinetic energy for motion at high speeds. The initial approach mistakenly applied F=ma, which is not suitable for relativistic speeds. After correcting the method and focusing on kinetic energy, the correct mass needed for annihilation was determined to be 10,000 kg. Additionally, users shared tips on how to format equations in the forum. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving similar physics problems effectively.
dylhynes
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A spaceship is powered by a matter-antimatter reactor. Suppose you have a 23000-metric-ton spaceship and wish to accelerate it to 0.03 c. What is the total mass of matter and anti matter required, assuming a 100 % efficient engine.

Homework Equations


Really not sure about this question, but thinking that E=mc^2 and F=ma will be used somewhere

The Attempt at a Solution


Not sure how to approach this problem, any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are right about ## E = mc^2 ##. This gives you the amount of matter/anti-matter one needs to annihilate to obtain energy ## E ##. However, ## F = ma ## is not good - it is only valid for slow motion, and 0.03 c may be too high for it. Instead, consider the relativistic kinetic energy of some mass M moving at 0.03 c.
 
Ahh, I understand what I did wrong now. I overlooked the fact that the spaceship only has kinetic energy while it is travelling. I solved for KE, then plugged that back into E=mc2. Rearranging for m I got the answer of 1.0x104 kg, which was correct. Thank you very much. Also if you don't mind answering, how did you type those equations in that math font ? I am new here.
 
Hit the quote button my message, and see the code for that. While you are there, click the ## \Sigma ## symbol at the top right of the text box, it will have a reference for much more.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top