Calculating the Moment of Inertia of an Irregular Rod Shape

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia for an irregular rod shape using integration over area. The user employs the equation Ixx = (integrate over area)(y^2)dA, breaking the rod into sections for individual calculations. They present a derived equation that incorporates various components of the rod, including the hollow cylinder and different rod sections. Suggestions are made to calculate the moment of inertia for a ring and an internal bar spanning the diameter. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in the calculation process and offers assistance for manual calculations.
mercuri2
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
To give you a better idea, I have it drawn out here: http://tinypic.com/r/eq6ln5/6

I am calling the thickness of a rod t and the thickness of the shaft t2. I am using the basic equation Ixx = (integrate over area)(y^2)dA on different sections and then adding them all together, following the guidelines of this website:

http://www.brighthubengineering.com...-inertia-of-irregular-sections-in-five-steps/

I split the shaft into sections, as follows: http://tinypic.com/r/2j5mc8l/6
I calculated the moment of inertia of each section and added them together.

Referring to half of one rod (aka half of the inner diameter) as L, I have come up with this equation:

=2*L^3*(SQRT(2)/2)^3 (three rods)
+2*(t*L*(1-(SQRT(2)/2))) (top of center rod)
+L*t^3/12 (middle horizontal rod)
+(PI()/4)*((L+t2)^4-(L)^4) (hollow cylinder)

Am I going about this the correct way? Any suggestions would be appreciated.

Thank you!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


Calculate the Ixx of the ring
then calculate the Ixx of an entire length of internal bar (spanning the diameter) and multiply by 4

If you want I could show you the process of manually calculating the second moment of inertia of the structure.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top