Calculating the Probability of Finding a Word in a Word Search Puzzle

Alfonso
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Howdy,

I'm completely not sure how to go about this problem. I feel like there is more than one way to approach this problem. I just know words can go forwards, backwards, and diagonal and just get stuck there. So here it is:

What is the probability that a letter in a given position within a 25x25 word
search puzzle is the first letter of a randomly chosen three-letter word beginning with the
letter "T"? In your calculations, assume that the letter of choice is "interior" to the puzzle,
in the sense that it is not possible to "leave" the puzzle by going two letters in any of the
allowed directions. Repeat the calculation (with the same proviso about letter position) for
one of seventeen speci cally chosen four-letter words.
Suppose you were offered a wager whereby you paid $1 to a bookie, who would return $2
if one of the seventeen words is in the puzzle, but would keep your dollar otherwise. Would
you take the bet? What is the expectation value of your cash flow in this transaction?

Thanks guys! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
please show your work ..
 
I don't really have any work because I don't know how to approach this problem. I mean what I tried to do was draw a picture, a 25x25 grid just to try and illustrate it. And then since it says to leave it by two blocks I shaded two block in every direction so it's more like a 23x23. That's it. Sorry, I don't know what to do :(
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top