Calculating the Probability of Winning in Risk: A Closed-Form Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter Big-Daddy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Game Probability
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about calculating the probability of winning in the game Risk, participants explore the possibility of deriving a closed-form solution for the probability of capturing a territory based on the number of attacking (A) and defending (D) armies. The rules specify the maximum dice rolls for attackers and defenders and detail how outcomes are determined based on the highest dice rolls. The focus is on expressing the function f(n)ij in closed form, as outlined in a referenced report, and understanding how to sum these probabilities effectively. The user seeks clarification on the final expressions presented in the report, particularly in relation to transition probability constants. The conversation emphasizes the need for a clear mathematical representation of the probabilities involved in the game.
Big-Daddy
Messages
333
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


In a game of Risk, the rules are:

The rules for determining how many dice a player may roll:

1. The attacker may roll as many dice as the number of attacking pieces he is using, to a maximum of 3. If A>3, the attacker continues to roll 3 dice per turn.
2. The defender may roll as many dice as the number of armies on his country, to a maximum of 2. If D>2, the defender continues to roll 2 dice per turn.

The rules for deciding the outcome of a particular throw of the dice are as follows:

1. The highest attacker die is compared against the highest defender die. Whoever has the lower number loses one army. Ties go to the defender.
2. The procedure is repeated for the second-highest dice, where both attackers and defenders have a second die.

If you attack a territory defended by D armies with A armies, what is the probability that you will capture this territory? In such a scenario, how many armies should you expect to lose (whichever side that will prevail)?

2. Other relevant info

Previously I had thought we needed a recursive solution, and reached one with the help of some members on this forum. But now I wonder if a closed-form solution is possible. Take a look at this report: http://web.archive.org/web/20060919204627/http://www4.stat.ncsu.edu/~jaosborn/research/RISK.pdf. As noted on page 2, A is the number of attacking armies and D is the number of defending armies.

First of all, the probabilities of each outcome on a certain turn are given on page 5. We don't need to worry about that. What really interests us is the section entitled "The Probability of Winning a Battle", and what comes after that (pages 4 onwards).

How do we express the function f(n)ij, found at the bottom of page 4, in closed form, in terms of the values of n, i and j? If we can figure this out, then, as noted half-way down page 5, fij is simply the sum of f(n)ij from n=1 to n=∞. And then, at the bottom of page 5, we perform a summation across all values of j. i=A*D apparently, or perhaps I am interpreting that wrong?

Anyway, if someone can give me help on how to reach the final 2 expressions on the bottom of page 5 in closed-form, that would be a great start.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Another PDF I have found which may offer some solutions is attached, but personally I find it even more confusing.

Edit: I should have noted above that where I said I want a closed-form solution in terms of the values of n, i and j, what I meant was a closed-form solution in terms of n, i, j and the transition probability constants listed on page 4, which I would prefer kept algebraic.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top