Calculating the Speed of Charged Spheres Moving Away from Each Other

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the speed of four charged spheres moving away from each other after being released. Initial potential energy is equated to final kinetic energy, but the user struggles with the correct summation of potential energy due to the interactions between the spheres. It's noted that each sphere's potential energy must account for the contributions from all other spheres, leading to confusion about whether to divide by the number of charges. The user is advised to revisit the definition of energy in a potential and consider integrating the forces acting on each sphere. The conversation highlights the complexities of energy conversion in multi-body systems.
Canadian
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Four 1.0 g spheres are released simultaneously and allowed to move away from each other. What is the speed of each sphere when they are very far apart?


The Attempt at a Solution



Here's what I got initial potential energy is equal to final kinetic energy.

0.9866 m/s but according to the computer program that's not right. Where'd I go wrong.

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • scan0002 (2).jpg
    scan0002 (2).jpg
    36.4 KB · Views: 555
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think your logic is sound but the working is a little iffy. Each sphere sits in the potential of the other three - that's a definite sum of potential energy for each. Moving then to a potential of zero has a definite energy conversion. The only important factors are the initial and final positions.

Consider first one of the spheres. It sits in a potential Kq^2/r from two of the other spheres, and Kq^2/sqrt(2)*r from the third. These sum to give its potential energy. Through symmetry, each of the other spheres is identical.

You appear to have too many terms in that potential energy summation.
 
Ok thanks, I think I see where I was going wrong I only need to consider the forces acting on one sphere alone since the rest will be identical in their speed.

Is this better? The computer program still doesn't like the answer I got.
 

Attachments

  • scan0003 (2).jpg
    scan0003 (2).jpg
    18 KB · Views: 541
Bump . .

Should I be dividing by 4 somewhere since there are 4 charges??
 
I'm honestly not sure. I had assumed that since the spheres were moving from a potential to no potential, the energy transfer was definite.

I think you'll have to go back to the definition of energy in a potential - integrate the instantaneous force on each sphere with respect to distance. I'm too tired and crap at maths to do this myself. Good luck.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top