Calculating the Speed of Charged Spheres Moving Away from Each Other

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the speed of four charged spheres moving away from each other after being released. Initial potential energy is equated to final kinetic energy, but the user struggles with the correct summation of potential energy due to the interactions between the spheres. It's noted that each sphere's potential energy must account for the contributions from all other spheres, leading to confusion about whether to divide by the number of charges. The user is advised to revisit the definition of energy in a potential and consider integrating the forces acting on each sphere. The conversation highlights the complexities of energy conversion in multi-body systems.
Canadian
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Four 1.0 g spheres are released simultaneously and allowed to move away from each other. What is the speed of each sphere when they are very far apart?


The Attempt at a Solution



Here's what I got initial potential energy is equal to final kinetic energy.

0.9866 m/s but according to the computer program that's not right. Where'd I go wrong.

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • scan0002 (2).jpg
    scan0002 (2).jpg
    36.4 KB · Views: 558
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think your logic is sound but the working is a little iffy. Each sphere sits in the potential of the other three - that's a definite sum of potential energy for each. Moving then to a potential of zero has a definite energy conversion. The only important factors are the initial and final positions.

Consider first one of the spheres. It sits in a potential Kq^2/r from two of the other spheres, and Kq^2/sqrt(2)*r from the third. These sum to give its potential energy. Through symmetry, each of the other spheres is identical.

You appear to have too many terms in that potential energy summation.
 
Ok thanks, I think I see where I was going wrong I only need to consider the forces acting on one sphere alone since the rest will be identical in their speed.

Is this better? The computer program still doesn't like the answer I got.
 

Attachments

  • scan0003 (2).jpg
    scan0003 (2).jpg
    18 KB · Views: 542
Bump . .

Should I be dividing by 4 somewhere since there are 4 charges??
 
I'm honestly not sure. I had assumed that since the spheres were moving from a potential to no potential, the energy transfer was definite.

I think you'll have to go back to the definition of energy in a potential - integrate the instantaneous force on each sphere with respect to distance. I'm too tired and crap at maths to do this myself. Good luck.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top