Calculating the Thevenin's Resistance of a Breadboarded Circuit

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Thevenin's resistance for the given breadboarded circuit is calculated to be 1.5 kOhm. The correct approach involves recognizing the parallel and series configurations of resistors, specifically that R1 and R2 are in parallel, followed by R3 in series with the equivalent resistance of R4 and R5, and finally R6 and R7 in parallel. The final calculation confirms that the Thevenin equivalent resistance is 1.5 kOhm, achieved through systematic reduction of the circuit. Understanding the grounding concept is crucial, as it allows for simplification of complex circuits.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Thevenin's theorem
  • Knowledge of resistor configurations (series and parallel)
  • Familiarity with circuit analysis techniques
  • Basic concepts of electrical grounding
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Thevenin's theorem applications in circuit analysis
  • Learn about resistor combinations in series and parallel
  • Explore advanced circuit analysis techniques, such as nodal and mesh analysis
  • Read about the role of grounding in electrical circuits and its implications
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, hobbyists building circuits, and professionals involved in circuit design and analysis will benefit from this discussion.

Samama Fahim
Messages
52
Reaction score
4
Screenshot - 8_17_2020 , 10_37_35 AM.png


How would we calculate the Thevenin's resistance for the above circuit? The right answer for this circuit is 1.5 kOhm.

$$R_{567} = R_7 + (R_5 \parallel R_6) = .5 + .67 = 1.2 k\Omega$$
$$R_{34567} = R_3 + (R_4 \parallel R_{567}) = 1 + .75 = 1.75 k\Omega$$
$$R_{TH} = R_1 + (R_2 \parallel R_{34567}) = 2 + .93 = 2.93 k\Omega,$$

which is not the right answer. Where am I making the mistake?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
R5 and R6 are not in parallel.
Hint: start at the other end...

PS Is this homework? If so it is in the wrong sub-forum
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
(1) Which sub-forum should I rather post it in?

(2) Starting at the other end:
$$R_{123} = R_1 + (R_2 \parallel R_3) = 2 + \frac{2}{3} = \frac{8}{3}\ \text{kOhm}$$
$$R_{12345} = R_{123} + (R_4 \parallel R_5) = \frac{8}{3} + \frac{2}{3} = \frac{10}{3}\ \text{kOhm}$$
$$R_{TH} = R_{12345} + (R_6 \parallel R_7) = \frac{10}{3} + \frac{2}{5} = \frac{56}{15}\ \text{kOhm} \neq 1.5\ \text{kOhm}$$
Still not the right answer.

(3) What's the key to determining whether two resistors are in parallel in a circuit at least not simple like the one above?
 
f95toli said:
PS Is this homework? If so it is in the wrong sub-forum
I moved it to the schoolwork forums.
 
Samama Fahim said:
What's the key to determining whether two resistors are in parallel in a circuit at least not simple like the one above?

It can be tricky sometimes.
In this case I believe the "key" is to realize that all the nodes at the bottom (which connects R2,R4 and R6) are grounded and at the same potential
It is therefore perfectly fine to re-draw the circuit and replace the sole ground symbol a the bottom left corner with individual ground connections for each resistor (R2, R4 and R6), once you've done this you can "cut" the leads between R2 and R4, R4 and R6 without changing the circuit in any way.

Try this. It should make it easier to see which resistors are in parallel.

Also,don't try to do too much as once. "Replace" two resistor at a time with a new resistor. Start in the left hand corner.

Edit: replaced some confusing language
 
Last edited:
circuit.png


It looks like R1 and R2 are in parallel, and R12 is in series with R3. And R4 and R5 are in parallel and R3 is in series with R45. Then R6 and R7 are in parallel. Is that right?
 
You are on the right track.

You do not need ground unless you are computing currents and voltages.
Slide the ground symbol along to point B.
Recognise the pattern. The circuit you have is called an R:2R ladder.

Notice that...
If two identical value resistors are in parallel, the equivalent is half the value of one resistor.
If two resistors are in series, the equivalent is the sum of the two.

Start with R1//R2.
You should be able to progressively reduce the circuit to the thevenin equivalent, from left to right, without writing an equation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Merlin3189 and Jody
Samama Fahim said:
View attachment 267894

It looks like R1 and R2 are in parallel, and R12 is in series with R3. And R4 and R5 are in parallel and R3 is in series with R45. Then R6 and R7 are in parallel. Is that right?

Yes, that is what I meant.

I should point out that my description above wasn't very good :frown: . Current CAN of course flow to ground in the lower lead (meaning current is strictly speaking flowing between the bottom nodes, although they are at the same potential).
I was trying to explain why re-drawing the circuit the way you did is fine, but I should have been more careful in my wording

Baluncore's suggestion of simply "sliding" the ground symbol to B would have been a better suggestion.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
$$R_{12} = R_1 \parallel R_2 = 1$$
$$R_{123} = R_{12} + R_3 = 2$$
$$R_{1234} = R_{123} \parallel R_4 = 1$$
$$R_{12345} = R_{1234} + R_5 = 2$$
$$R_{123456} = R_{12345} \parallel R_6 = 1$$
$$R_{\text{TH}} = R_{123456} + R_7 = 1.5$$

@f95toli @Baluncore thanks.

Could any of you suggest me a book or some article that would discuss concept like the ground and where its use is appropriate?
 
  • #10
Samama Fahim said:
that would discuss concept like the ground
It is not some additional component in a circuit. Ground is just a node which is "assigned" a potential of 0V. All other node voltages are w.r.t the ground node. You can choose any node as the ground node, just be consistent with directions and polarities.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Merlin3189

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K